Hong Kong’s new national security bill includes stiff penalties and more powers to suppress dissent

HONG KONG —  Hong Kong unveiled a proposed law Friday that threatens life imprisonment for residents who “endanger national security,” deepening worries about erosion of the city’s freedoms four years after Beijing imposed a similar law that all but wiped out public dissent.

It’s widely seen as the latest step in a crackdown on political opposition that began after the semiautonomous Chinese city was rocked by violent pro-democracy protests in 2019. Since then, authorities have crushed the city’s once-vibrant political culture. Many of Hong Kong’s leading pro-democracy activists have been arrested and others fled abroad. Dozens of civil society groups have been disbanded, and outspoken media outlets including Apple Daily and Stand News have been shut down.

Hong Kong leader John Lee has urged legislators to push the Safeguarding National Security Bill through “at full speed,” and lawmakers are set to begin debate on it Friday afternoon. It’s expected to pass easily, possibly in weeks, in a legislature packed with Beijing loyalists after an electoral overhaul.

The proposed law will expand the government’s power to stamp challenges to its rule, targeting espionage, disclosing state secrets and “colluding with external forces” to commit illegal acts, among others. It includes tougher penalties for people convicted of working with foreign governments or organizations to break some of its provisions.

The law would jail people who damage public infrastructure with the intent to endanger national security for 20 years — or life, if they collude with an external force to do so. In 2019, protesters occupied the airport and vandalized railway stations.

Similarly, those who commit sedition face a jail term of seven years, but colluding with an external force to carry out such acts increases that penalty to 10 years.

On Thursday, an appeals court upheld a conviction for sedition against a pro-democracy activist for chanting slogans and criticizing the Beijing-imposed 2020 National Security Law during a political campaign.

Its expansive definition of external forces includes foreign governments and political parties, international organizations and “any other organization in an external place that pursues political ends” — as well as companies that are influenced by such forces.

Critics say that the proposed law would make Hong Kong even more like mainland China.

The government said it was necessary to prevent a recurrence of the massive anti-government protests of 2019, insisting it would affect only “an extremely small minority” of disloyal residents.

The legislature’s president, Andrew Leung, told reporters that the process was accelerated because the bill was necessary to safeguard national security.

“If you look at other countries, they enacted it within a day, two weeks, three week. ... So why can’t Hong Kong do it in a speedy manner? You tell me,” the pro-Beijing politician said.

Hong Kong’s mini-constitution, the Basic Law, requires the city to enact a national security law, but a previous attempt sparked a massive street protest that drew half a million people, and the legislation was shelved.

Such protests against the current bill are unlikely, due to the chilling effect of the 2020 law.

During a one-month public comment period that ended last week, 98.6% of the comments received by officials showed support, and 0.72% opposed the proposals, the government said. The rest contained questions or opinions that did not reflect a stance on the law, it added.

But business people and journalists have expressed fear that a broadly framed law could criminalize their day-to-day work, especially because the proposed definition of state secrets includes matters linked to economic, social and technological developments. The government has sought to allay concerns by adding a public-interest defense under specific conditions in the proposal.

John Burns, an honorary professor of politics and public administration at the University of Hong Kong, said it remains to be seen how courts will interpret the provision that allows a public-interest defense to charges of disclosing state secrets.

The bill, if passed as written, is likely to have a stifling effect on local civil society, Burns said, especially political and public policy lobby groups that have benefited from connections to overseas counterparts.

“At least initially, I expect them to be especially cautious about expanding links with similar groups overseas,” he said.

The law also authorizes stiffer measures against suspects in national security cases. Those who are arrested but released on bail could face a “movement restriction order,” which limits the places they can live and enter and prevents them from communicating with certain people.

Authorities would be empowered to hit absconders with financial sanctions, such as preventing other people from hiring them, leasing them property, starting businesses with them or providing economic support to them.

Last year, police offered bounties of 1 million Hong Kong dollars — $128,000 in U.S. currency — on more than a dozen activists living abroad, including former lawmakers Nathan Law and Ted Hui, whom they accuse of colluding with external forces to impose sanctions on Hong Kong and China.

Prisoners convicted of national security offenses will not be eligible for sentence reductions until authorities are confident early release would not risk national security. This would apply to all national security prisoners, even those whose sentences were imposed prior to the bill.