Man charged with rape of 10-year-old Ohio girl who traveled to Indiana for abortion
COLUMBUS, Ohio — An Ohio man has been charged with raping a 10-year-old girl whose case drew national attention following a doctor’s comments that the child had to travel to Indiana for an abortion, an account that had led some prominent Republicans — including Ohio’s attorney general and a congressman — to suggest it was fabricated.
President Biden highlighted the case last week at the signing of an executive order aimed at protecting access to abortion as Republican-led states, including Ohio, have enacted virtual bans after the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent landmark ruling that ended the constitutional protection of abortion rights.
For the record:
4:09 p.m. July 13, 2022A previous version of this article said that Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine was among those who had questioned the rape case’s veracity. He did not question its veracity. The previous version also said that Wednesday’s court proceeding was an arraignment. It was an initial court appearance, not an arraignment.
A detective testified Wednesday at an initial court appearance for the 27-year-old suspect that Columbus police learned about the girl’s pregnancy through a referral by Franklin County Children Services that was made by her mother June 22, and that she had an abortion in Indianapolis on June 30, the Columbus Dispatch reported.
The detective said DNA from the Indianapolis abortion clinic was being tested to confirm paternity.
An Indianapolis physician who provides abortion services, Dr. Caitlin Bernard, had told the Indianapolis Star that an abortion had been provided for such a child because the girl couldn’t get the procedure in Ohio under a newly imposed state ban on abortions at the first detectable fetal cardiac activity. A judge lifted a stay on the ban after the Supreme Court’s ruling overturning Roe vs. Wade.
Appearing Monday on Fox News, Republican Ohio Atty. Gen. Dave Yost said he hadn’t heard “a whisper” from law enforcement in Ohio about any reports or arrests made in connection with such a case.
“Another lie. Anyone surprised?” Republican U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan tweeted in reaction.
Then Wednesday, Jordan tweeted that the suspect “should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.” A message was left with his office Wednesday seeking comment.
In the Fox interview, Yost suggested that the young rape victim would have met the Ohio abortion ban’s exception for medical emergencies.
“This young girl, if she exists and if this horrible thing happened to her — it breaks my heart to think about it — she did not have to leave Ohio to find treatment,” he said.
The law defines an emergency as life-threatening or involving a “serious risk of the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function.” Under that definition, the 10-year-old’s condition wouldn’t have risen to the threshold of an emergency, Kellie Copeland, director of Pro-Choice Ohio, an abortion rights group, said Wednesday.
In a statement Wednesday, Yost said the state Bureau of Criminal Investigation stands ready to help prosecute the case. He did not address his previous suggestions that the case was fabricated.
Gov. Mike DeWine, a Republican, previously called the crime a tragedy. “He has said that if the evidence supports, the rapist should spend the rest of his life in prison,” said DeWine spokesperson Dan Tierney.
Police say the suspect confessed to raping the girl. He was arrested Tuesday and has not entered a plea.
Court records don’t specify whether or how the suspect knew the girl. The prosecutor’s office declined to comment on the case, and the police department did not respond to a request for additional details. The Associated Press generally doesn’t identify victims of sexual assault and, for now, is not naming the suspect to avoid inadvertently identifying the girl.
In 2019, the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana filed a lawsuit on behalf of Bernard, the doctor in the 10-year-old’s case, challenging a law passed by Indiana’s Republican-dominated Legislature that largely banned a second-trimester abortion procedure that the legislation called “dismemberment abortion.”
The law took effect for the first time last week after a federal judge lifted an injunction blocking it following the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe vs. Wade.
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.