Israel appears mired in another election deadlock as votes are tallied
JERUSALEM — Israel on Wednesday appeared to be barreling toward another political stalemate after what was shaping up to be its fourth inconclusive election in two years. But there were small signs the country’s bitter rivals were looking for creative solutions to find a way out of the impasse and avoid another election.
Candidates across the political spectrum called for unity and healing, and a little known Islamist lawmaker emerged as the politician most likely to choose the country’s next prime minister. Mansour Abbas said he was “not in the pocket of anyone” and vowed to listen to offers from anyone willing to talk to him.
Even embattled Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who had previously pledged not to partner with Abbas, said he would not rule out anyone as a potential governing partner.
“I disqualify no one,” Netanyahu told supporters early Wednesday. “A stable government for the state of Israel, that is what the times require.... We must not, under any circumstances, drag the state of Israel to new elections.”
Tuesday’s election, like its three recent predecessors, was seen as a referendum on Netanyahu and his polarizing leadership style.
For supporters, Netanyahu is the man who is uniquely qualified to lead the country through its numerous political, diplomatic and security challenges. His opponents see him as a liar and egomaniac who has pushed the country into repeated election cycles in hopes of producing a parliament dominated by supporters who can grant him immunity from his ongoing corruption trial, which resumes April 5.
Israel is back in election mode for the fourth time in two years, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu facing major challenges to staying in power.
Once again, the nation appeared to be hopelessly divided. After a protracted period that has included the COVID-19 pandemic, a highly successful vaccine rollout, four diplomatic breakthroughs with Arab countries and a change in the White House, Israelis again voted based on their feelings toward Netanyahu.
With nearly 90% of the votes counted Wednesday, neither Netanyahu’s supporters nor his opponents appeared to have secured the 61-seat majority in parliament required to form a government.
Netanyahu’s Likud Party and its ultra-Orthodox and far-right allies were projected to control 59 seats — even if the small Yamina party were to join it. Yamina’s leader, former Netanyahu ally turned critic Naftali Bennett, has not said which way he will go.
Netanyahu’s opponents were poised to finish with 61 seats. However, even if that projection is upheld by final official results in the coming days, there is no guarantee the anti-Netanyahu parties could all come together to form an alternative government. The bloc includes a range of parties — Arab and Jewish, religious and secular, dovish and nationalist toward the Palestinians — that have little in common beyond their distaste for Netanyahu.
Start your day right
Sign up for Essential California for the L.A. Times biggest news, features and recommendations in your inbox six days a week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
“Assuming all parties and politicians keep up their pre-election promises and the results remain unchanged, then we’re heading toward a fifth election,” said Yohanan Plesner, president of the Israel Democracy Institute, a Jerusalem think tank. “This can be avoided if pre-election promises or pledges are unwound.”
Already, there were signs of this taking place. On Wednesday, just days after Netanyahu vowed never to cooperate with Abbas, one of the prime minister’s closest allies, Cabinet Minister Tzachi Hanegbi, praised the Arab lawmaker as it became apparent his small United Arab List had squeaked into parliament.
In a live interview on Channel 13 TV, Hanegbi called Abbas a “moderate” and said it would be an “injustice to Israeli society” if he did not get into the parliament, or Knesset. He told another channel that he considered Abbas a potential coalition partner.
Other members of Likud, which in past campaigns had depicted Arab citizens as a potential fifth column, reacted angrily to Hanegbi’s comments. But given his close ties with Netanyahu, Hanegbi’s remarks appeared to be a sort of trial balloon.
A wave of demonstrations is sweeping Israel against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his perceived failure to handle Israel’s coronavirus crisis.
Abbas basked in his newfound fame on Wednesday, appearing on TV and radio programs throughout the day. He said he would consider offers from both Netanyahu and his chief opponent, Yair Lapid, to join a future coalition, possibly even as a Cabinet minister.
He said he would listen to their proposals for addressing problems in Arab society, including poverty, violence and discrimination, and then make up his mind.
“We will wait patiently. We are not rushing anywhere,” he told Channel 13. “We want to avoid a fifth election, but not at any cost.”
Whether Abbas can lead an Arab party into an Israeli coalition at all remains an uncertain prospect.
Netanyahu’s likely coalition partners would include the Religious Zionist Party, whose leaders espouse racist anti-Arab views. Some members of the anti-Netanyahu camp have also said they would not share power with Abbas.
“We are far from seeing Abbas as a Cabinet minister,” said Thabet Abu Rass, co-executive director of the Abraham Initiatives, an advocacy group that promotes coexistence in Israel. “However, something new is taking place. There is more legitimization of Arab voters.”
Abu Rass said the new discourse is about making Israel’s Arab minority, long confined to the political fringe, partners in decision making. “The question is how to do it and with whom to do it,” he said.
The Israeli election commission was set to begin counting an estimated 450,000 absentee ballots, a higher-than-usual number due to the many people who contracted the coronavirus or who are in quarantine.
Once those votes are tallied and certified, the country’s figurehead president, Reuven Rivlin, will begin a lengthy process of consulting with party leaders before designating one of them — the one he deems has the best chance of putting together a government — to form a new coalition.
Given the deep divisions, this process is expected to take weeks and will require at least one party to compromise its basic values.
In addition to luring Abbas, Lapid, for instance, might try to reach a deal with ultra-Orthodox rivals from Netanyahu’s camp. Both sides might also try to poach renegade lawmakers from the other side, all in a frantic effort to gain or maintain power.
And a fifth election, despite the deep opposition voiced across the political spectrum, remains a strong possibility. In the meantime, Netanyahu will run a caretaker government with limited powers.
“Regardless of whether Netanyahu forms a government or doesn’t, the deadlock will continue to paralyze the Israeli government as long as Netanyahu remains at the helm,” wrote Yediot Aharonot columnist Nahum Barnea. “This is bad news for every Israeli.”
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
