U.S. drops Trump plan for more biometric data on immigrants - Los Angeles Times
Advertisement

U.S. drops Trump plan for more biometric data on immigrants

A woman and her daughter with a U.S. border official.
A woman and her daughter have their biometric data entered at an immigration intake area of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security holding facility in Donna, Texas.
(Dario Lopez-Mills / Associated Press)
Share via

The Biden administration on Friday withdrew a Trump-era proposal to expand the amount and types of biometric data collected by U.S. immigration authorities.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said the proposed rule submitted for public comment in September would be withdrawn as part of the new administration’s goal of reducing “barriers and undue burdens” in the immigration system.

The family was among the earliest separated under the Trump administration. More than a thousand families remain separated.

May 4, 2021

In a statement announcing the withdrawal of the proposal, the agency said the Department of Homeland Security would continue to collect biometrics “where appropriate.” That includes fingerprints and photos of people applying for citizenship and iris scans of people apprehended at the U.S. border.

Advertisement

The proposal issued under President Trump would have, if adopted, enabled Customs and Immigration Services to collect more types of biometrics, including voice prints and DNA, from anyone applying to enter the U.S. and their family members, including children.

The Trump administration argued that it would improve security vetting, help reduce fraud and make the immigration system more efficient by, for example, allowing people to check the status of applications with just their voice. DNA, officials said at the time, would be used to ensure people were related family members as claimed and would not be stored.

But critics said the proposal would add unnecessary steps to an already cumbersome immigration process and discourage people from even seeking to come to the U.S. because of the intrusiveness of the data collection.

Advertisement