Kennewick Man: Scientists unravel 9,300-year-old skeleton’s past

SEATTLE — The long-running detective saga involving one of North America’s earliest inhabitants has taken a new twist, with news that Kennewick Man — the shockingly intact 9,300-year-old skeleton unearthed in 1996 on the banks of the Columbia River — probably was a visitor to central Washington, not a longtime inhabitant.

More likely, Smithsonian Institution anthropologist Douglas Owsley announced in a pair of lectures this week in Washington state, he came from the coast, not the arid inland valley where his remains were found.

The conclusion is important in the quest to understand where the now-famous Paleoamerican came from and who his descendants might be. The ancient bones were the subject of a decade-long court fight over whether central Washington Native American tribes had claim to the remains for reburial.

“I felt it was important to have a meeting with the tribes of the Columbia Basin that are especially interested -- it’s their homeland territory, and they feel very deep connections and roots. I felt it of vital importance that I have a face-to-face meeting and give them an overview as to what the scientific evidence was telling us,” Owsley said of his meeting this week with tribal leaders from the Columbia Plateau region.

Owsley, with science writer Susan Walker, has published a new book for teens: “Their Skeletons Speak: Kennewick Man and the Paleoamerican World,” in which he describes the painstaking process through which scientists have come to understand the mysterious man found by two youths watching a boat race.

Through carbon dating and other means, analysts relatively quickly determined that the skeleton was not that of a recent murder victim but an ancient clue to how human civilization arrived in North America.

Kennewick Man was 5’6” to 5’7”, weighed 154 to 165 pounds, and had strong, powerful legs, as would someone who moved quickly in water to spear fish or hunt small animals, Owsley says in the book.

His had not been an easy life. He had a depression in his skull above the left eye where he must have fallen or been struck by a rock; he had a healed fracture of his right shoulder; he had a shoulder injury, most likely from repeated spear throwing, identical to the kind of injury baseball pitchers often suffer; and there was evidence of a terrible spear wound to his right hip, probably suffered when he was between 15 and 20 years old.

“During the days immediately following the injury, Kennewick Man could barely stand. Shock and pain left him weak. He needed care and help. Without the aid of others, he would have died,” Owsley and Walker wrote.

That aid apparently extended to his demise. The fact that he appears to have been laid horizontally in the sand next to the river, his arms quietly at his sides, suggests he was placed there carefully by human hands.

The big news now, though, is that Kennewick Man — such a huge subject of contention in the inland Columbia Valley — didn’t come from there at all, but rather, most likely, the coast.

“You have to work awfully hard to get to a point where he is in that [Columbia Plateau] domain. It is easier, more understandable, to put him in a place of coastal origins, where he’s heavily dependent on marine proteins,” Owsley told The Times.

To help figure this out, scientists determined a nitrogen isotope value for the bones, which suggested that his diet was not high in grazing animals such as deer and elk, but much more likely based on marine mammals such as seals, which feed on fish, Owsley said.

Further, separate measurements of oxygen isotopes did not suggest he had consumed much water from the Columbia River -- another clue.

The new book goes on to document how scientists reached the conclusion from Kennewick Man’s skull size and shape that he was not directly related to modern-day Native Americans. He was most like the Moriori, a Polynesian people in the Chatham Islands, near New Zealand. He is also like the Morioris’ ancestors, the Ainu, who lived in coastal areas of mainland Asia 15,000 years ago.

“Did they leave their homeland when people from central Asia migrated to the coast?” Owsley and Walker ask. “Over many generations, had they paddled to new homes, some traveling south toward New Zealand, while others coast-hopped in boats northward and finally east to North America? Their skulls and those of the earliest Paleoamericans seem to support this.”

Because of the cultural sensitivities of the issue, scientists had only a little more than two weeks, mostly in 2005 and 2006, to examine the remains that now lie under lock and key at Seattle’s Burke Museum. But Owsley, who is completing the editing of a much more exhaustive scientific volume on their findings, hopes to apply to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for permission to conduct additional studies.

For one thing, he said, scientists might be able to analyze the basalt from the spear tip still embedded in Kennewick Man’s hip and determine from where, geographically, it came. Also, he is convinced a future team might have better luck extracting DNA from the skeleton, perhaps from its teeth.

“In an ideal world, I would prefer to see that other scientists have an opportunity to collect information,” he said. “And there are certain other things that could help us know some of the unknowns, that are knowable.”

ALSO:

Tom DeLay attorney asks Texas judges to overturn conviction

Tucson contractor attacked home with chemicals over unpaid bill

Ruling out race in college admissions: How far will the high court go?