Giant cross ordered removed in San Diego; supporters hope for appeal - Los Angeles Times
Advertisement

Giant cross ordered removed in San Diego; supporters hope for appeal

Share via

SAN DIEGO -- Supporters of a giant cross atop Mt. Soledad are holding out hope for an appeal to a federal judge’s order Thursday that the display be removed within 90 days as a violation of the separation of church and state.

After two decades of legal and political wrangling, U.S. District Judge Larry Burns on Thursday issued the order, although he also issued a stay so that those defending the cross have time to appeal.

One of the strongest supporters of keeping the cross has been Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Alpine), a Marine veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan. His spokesman, Joe Kasper, said Burns’ ruling was not unexpected and “the true test will come if and when the U.S. Supreme Court decides to take the case.”

Advertisement

“Without the cross, the memorial loses its identity as an unforgettable symbol of appreciation to generations of sacrifice,” Kasper said. “It’s still too soon to say that the cross won’t stay right where it is.”

Congress voted to transfer ownership of the cross from the city to the federal government but the 9th Circuit struck down the transfer as unconstitutional.

The decision on whether to appeal Burns’ ruling will be made by the Department of Justice.

Built in 1954, the 43-foot cross is one of the most visible landmarks in San Diego. Starting in the early 1990s, plaques honoring military veterans have been placed on walls surrounding the base of the cross.

Advertisement

Jewish war veterans and the ACLU have argued that having the cross on public property is an unconstitutional endorsement of religion.

Defenders of the cross have argued that it is a war memorial, not exclusively a religious symbol.

In 2011, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the cross violated the 1st Amendment. In 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the issue, sending the case back to the trial court in San Diego.

Advertisement

“In spite of many secular changes to the memorial, its long sectarian history, as found by the 9th Circuit, effectively prevents the government from purging the religious connotation in any other way,” Burns wrote in removal order.

ALSO:

Man’s car containing his wife’s ashes is stolen at carwash

Santa’s existential dilemma: To be white, black or a penguin?

Ronni Chasen autopsy report contradicts police account of her death

Twitter: @LATsandiego

Advertisement

[email protected]

Advertisement