Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
This measure asks voters to change parts of Proposition 47, a controversial ballot initiative passed in 2014 that turned some nonviolent felonies into misdemeanors.
What will the measure do?
Under Proposition 36, an offender with two prior convictions for theft could be charged with a “wobbler” felony regardless of the value of the merchandise, meaning a judge would retain discretion to reduce the charge to a misdemeanor. The ballot measure also allows judges to sentence convicted drug dealers who traffic in large quantities of hard drugs, including fentanyl, or who are armed with a firearm while trafficking the drugs to state prison instead of county jails. Proposition 36 also would authorize greater consequences for hard drug dealers whose sales of fentanyl kill or seriously injure a person who uses those drugs, and would authorize a judge to warn convicted dealers that they could be charged with murder in the future if someone dies as a result of the drugs they sold.
It is expected to cost the state hundreds of millions of dollars annually.
Who are the supporters?
Proponents include prosecutors and law enforcement leaders, including the California District Attorneys Assn., which mostly comprises conservative prosecutors, and the California Sheriff’s Assn. Noteworthy politicians who support Proposition 36 include San José Mayor Matt Mahan and San Francisco Mayor London Breed. The California Republican Party has endorsed the measure. Also in support of the measure are Elk Grove Mayor Bobbie Singh-Allen and Sacramento County Dist. Atty. Thien Ho, who along with Mahan created a fundraising committee. As of mid-September, nearly 200 local elected officials, ranging from mayors to council members, have come out in support of the measure.
Large retailers, such as Walmart, Target and Home Depot, have been major contributors to Proposition 36.
Supporters argue that tougher criminal penalties are needed to curb theft and the rising use of fentanyl.
Who are the opponents?
Gov. Gavin Newsom and top Democratic legislative leaders initially opposed asking California voters to alter Proposition 47, but then proposed their own ballot measure as an alternative to the prosecutor-led, tough-on-crime measure. They quickly withdrew that proposal, however, just days after announcing it.
Criminal justice reform groups including the American Civil Liberties Union, Vera Institute for Justice, Ella Baker Center and human rights activists have been outspoken against altering Proposition 47, saying that it will lead to an increase in the state’s prison population and the associated costs. California Attorneys for Criminal Justice, which is composed of criminal defense attorneys, has called it “draconian.” Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors cast a vote in opposition to the initiative in September.
How much money has been raised?
Retail and law enforcement organizations are donating in support of California’s Proposition 36, which would turn some misdemeanors into felonies.
Walmart is the biggest supporter with $3.6 million in contributions. Other top donors include retailers such as Home Depot and Target with $1 million each and 7-Eleven and associated committees with more than $600,000. In-N-Out Burger contributed $500,000. The California Republican Party has endorsed the measure and, according to state campaign finance reports, has also spent more than $1 million. The measure has also received support from some district attorneys and law enforcement organizations.
Criminal justice reform groups and human rights activists oppose the measure. Major criminal justice reform donors include Patty Quillin with $1.5 million, Stacy Schusterman with $1 million, Elizabeth Simons and husband Mark Heising with a combined $855,000 and Quinn Delaney with $225,000. Unions representing healthcare workers and teachers are also major contributors to the opposition.
Past coverage
One month before the election, a new poll finds 60% of California likely voters favor Proposition 36 to impose stiffer penalties for theft and drug crimes.
A measure to impose harsher penalties for drug possession and theft, altering the controversial Prop. 47 passed in 2014, has qualified for November’s ballot.
A coalition backing a tough-on-crime statewide ballot initiative to toughen penalties for retail theft and some drug offenses on Thursday submitted more than 900,000 voter signatures backing the measure, a strong indicator that it may come before California voters in November.
Gavin Newsom could save the state $1 billion annually by closing five more prisons, analysts say. The governor finds himself in a precarious political spot.
Meanwhile, supporters of an initiative to repeal parts of Proposition 47 say they will soon submit enough signatures to qualify their measure for the November ballot.
L.A. Times Editorial Board Endorsements
The Times’ editorial board operates independently of the newsroom — reporters covering these races have no say in the endorsements.
How and where to vote
Get our L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox three times per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
