Logging project in Yosemite National Park halted after environmental lawsuit
A controversial plan to expand logging in Yosemite National Park has been temporarily halted under a recent court order from a federal judge.
The National Park Service has sought to allow logging across nearly 2,000 acres of Yosemite. Federal authorities say the forest-thinning project would be aimed at removing dead trees that can provide fuel for wildfires.
But the Earth Island Institute, an environmental nonprofit, filed a lawsuit in federal court last month alleging that the park service began logging for commercial purposes in Yosemite without public notice or assessing environmental risks. The lawsuit was filed against the National Park Service and Cicely Muldoon, superintendent of Yosemite National Park.
On Friday, a federal judge ordered the National Park Service to halt the logging operation and continue operations under its 2017 fire management plan. That plan largely leans on prescribed burns over tree thinning and removal, according to the John Muir Project, a project under the Earth Island Institute that has spoken out against the logging proposal.
The court order calls for only limited rehabilitation work along Merced Grove Road and states that “no trees will be cut during this work.”
The Washburn fire, burning in the area of the famed Mariposa Grove of giant sequoias, had grown to 60 to 70 acres shortly after 7 p.m.
According to the lawsuit, the National Park Service began commercial logging under a new “biomass removal and thinning” project around May 11. At that time, the nonprofit became aware of a new forest thinning and logging plan that was posted to the National Park Service’s website, it said.
Scientists have spoken out about the risk around commercial logging projects that fall under the fold of fire management but may increase the severity of wildfires.
Last year, more than 200 scientists signed a letter to Congress and President Biden warning of commercial logging’s potential to increase carbon emissions and worsen the climate crisis, according to the John Muir Project. The letter stated that “thinning” and “fuel reduction” efforts could remove mature, fire-resistant trees that are needed for forest resilience and could increase wildfire intensity.
Representatives from Yosemite National Park did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The park service’s proposed logging project in Yosemite would span the Merced and Tuolumne groves of giant sequoias, Yosemite Valley, and the communities of Yosemite West, Wawona, El Portal, Foresta and Yosemite Village.
Desperate to protect the giant trees, fire officials have wrapped them in foil and doused them with gel. Some methods have never been tested.
Project plans state that “immediate actions are needed to protect these areas from high severity fire.” The plan calls for thinning conifer trees that are less than 20 inches in diameter, standing dead trees and downed trees that died after the 2012-16 drought, according to project documents.
“We are pleased that the Park Service and its attorneys were willing to work with us to avoid the need for a temporary restraining order,” Tom Buchele, an attorney representing the Earth Island Institute, said in a statement.
Buchele added that halting this project will “provide the greatest protections to communities from fires” and prevent logging in areas that would cause “irreparable harm” to Yosemite’s forests.
The court order was delivered as both parties in the lawsuit await a formal hearing on a preliminary injunction to halt the logging project, which is scheduled for Aug. 15.
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
