California’s largest pension funds have ties to Russia. That soon may change
California’s governor called on the heads of the state’s two largest pension funds and of the University of California Retirement System to divest any Russian investments, as the state joined others in the nation trying to squeeze Russia over its war in Ukraine.
In a letter late Monday, Gov. Gavin Newsom also asked the officials to give recommendations within 10 days on how the state can protect its investments amid U.S. and worldwide sanctions against Russia.
The request came hours after California lawmakers outlined plans to introduce a bill that would force the California Public Employees’ Retirement System and the California State Teachers’ Retirement System, as well as all other state agencies, to divest Russian assets.
The bill, which is expected to be introduced in the next few days, was planned to contain an urgency clause that would have it take effect immediately once passed by the Legislature and signed by the governor. The governor’s subsequent statement appears to urge the funds to move even more quickly on divestment.
“Russia’s brazen and lawless military assault on Ukraine demands our support for the Ukrainian people and exacting an immediate and severe cost upon the Russian government in response to its continuing aggression,” he wrote. “California has a unique and powerful position of influence given the state’s substantial global investment portfolio.”
Newsom said CalPERS and CalSTRS, the nation’s two largest public pension funds, and the UC system, have a combined $1.5 billion in Russian investments. His statement called on the funds to offload the assets while protecting retiree income.
The separate bill in the works would also ask California companies to divest Russian assets, and it would block the awarding of state contracts to companies doing business with Russia.
“The world is watching the atrocities taking place in Ukraine. It’s sickening,” Senate Majority Leader Mike McGuire (D-Healdsburg) said in a statement. “California has unique and remarkable economic power in this circumstance. As the fifth-largest economy in the world, we must use this power for good. We can help stop this autocratic thug, Putin, by advancing this critical legislation and enacting our own financial divestments.”
CalPERS, which provides pension benefits to state and local government employees, currently holds no Russian government debt but has investments in publicly traded Russian companies, real estate and some private equity totaling $900 million to $1.1 billion at any given time, fund spokeswoman Megan White said.
The financial sanctions on Russia are vast and unprecedented. Here’s how they work.
That means its exposure to Russian assets comprises only a fraction of the fund, which is the largest public pension fund in the nation, with $485 billion under management as of June 30.
“CalPERS supports the people of Ukraine who are suffering due to what is an unjustified and unprovoked attack,” Chief Executive Marcie Frost said in a statement. “CalPERS investments in Russia total less than 1% of our total portfolio. We are monitoring current events and will take action as appropriate to protect the interests of our members.”
CalSTRS, which provides pension benefits to teachers and is the nation’s second-largest public pension fund, had investments in Russia worth less than $500 million as of Feb. 23, fund spokesman Bill Ainsworth said. Since then, the value has dropped because of the volatility in the market and repositioning of the portfolio.
“Therefore the actual exposure number could be much lower. CalSTRS is a long-term investor and we are continuing to actively manage our positions,” he said in an emailed statement.
Although the figures provided did not break down the fund’s investments, a public database on its website shows it held almost $32 million in Russian government debt as well as about $1.5 million in Russian rubles as of June 30. The database also shows that at the time it held shares in companies such as Gazprom and Russian banks Sberbank and VTB — both sanctioned by the U.S — valued at roughly $800 million. With the fund totaling $319.8 billion as of Jan. 31, any current holdings would amount to less than 1% of CalSTRS assets.
The proposed bill is supported by a bipartisan coalition of state senators and Assembly members, according to McGuire’s office.
Will gas and food prices continue to rise? How might the conflict in Eastern Europe affect Silicon Valley and Hollywood?
California joins other states taking steps to divest Russian assets or pressure Putin over the war.
Georgia House Speaker David Ralston, a Republican, got a bipartisan standing ovation Monday when he told representatives he would seek to have the state’s retirement funds quickly divest any Russian assets.
“I don’t know about y’all, but I don’t want one penny of Georgians’ money going to subsidize Vladimir Putin,” Ralston said. “While our role in international affairs is limited, we make clear we stand with those who want to live in peace.”
On Monday, the Indiana House passed legislation that would block Russian-controlled businesses and nonprofits from acquiring property in Indiana for one year. It now goes to the Senate.
And New York Gov. Kathy Hochul signed an executive order Sunday forbidding her state from doing business with Russia. She ordered state agencies to divest money and assets from companies or institutions aiding Russia in its war against Ukraine. The Democratic governor also said New York would welcome Ukrainian refugees, noting that New York already is home to the largest Ukrainian population in the U.S.
“We strongly condemn the action of Putin and Russia for this unprovoked attack, which is now leading to atrocities against innocent human beings,” she said.
Other states taking action included Pennsylvania, Connecticut, New Jersey, Virginia and North Dakota.
California Assemblyman Chad Mayes (I-Rancho Mirage) said he would push to have the state’s legislation expanded to include such local funds as the Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Assn. if the bill doesn’t initially include it.
“We have to send a very clear message that the aggression that was shown by Putin and Russia towards the Ukrainian people is unacceptable,” he said.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Inside the business of entertainment
The Wide Shot brings you news, analysis and insights on everything from streaming wars to production — and what it all means for the future.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
